This site contains the views and opinions of American Muslims living in Michigan on a wide range of issues affecting our lives. Its authors are just a sampling of the diverse American Muslim community here, comprising many races, ethnicities and sects. Although we do not speak for any particular group, we are members of the large moderate majority of Muslims who call America their home and feel a responsibility to see that it prospers.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Robert Fisk speaks at CAIR-MI's annual banquet

Today in Dearborn, Michigan, the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations held it's annual banquet.

Approximately 1,100 people were in attendance including representatives in government and interfaith leaders.

British Journalist Robert Fisk was the keynote speaker.

Cut & paste the following link to listen to Mr. Fisk's speech:http://www.zshare.net/audio/fiskatcair-mi-mp3.html

Muslim activist strives to bridge cultures

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070325/NEWS05/703250607/1007/NEWS05

March 25, 2007
BY NIRAJ WARIKOO
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

When Dawud Walid opened the mail one day last June in his Lathrup Village office, he found a torn page of the Quran smeared with feces.

It was an unpleasant reminder of the challenges that face the Michigan branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which Walid heads.

"We have a lot of work to do," Walid said he thought after opening the letter.

Those efforts are drawing a growing number of supporters in metro Detroit, as evidenced by a sold-out fund-raising dinner in Dearborn today that's expected to attract about 1,100 guests -- compared to 600 two years ago.

"Islam isn't often portrayed correctly," said Nayeem Amin, 18, of Bloomfield Hills, a CAIR supporter. "They're educating the public on what Islam is about."

Walid, a Sunni Muslim, does that by speaking often at universities and churches and to media outlets. Since becoming executive director of the council's Michigan branch in July 2005, Walid has frequently been the public face of Islam in metro Detroit.

His first week on the job, after terrorists struck the London subway on July 7, 2005, Walid quickly organized a group of imams to condemn the attacks at a news conference at the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn.(MORE)

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Opression ingrained in some youth

http://www.mlive.com/news/kzgazette/index.ssf?/base/news-22/1174710013206590.xml&coll=7

Kalamazoo Gazette

Oppression ingrained in some youth

Saturday, March 24, 2007

By John Liberty

jliberty@kalamazoogazette.com

388-8579

Dawud Walid quoted a passage from the Quran to deliver his speech's point on social justice: Oppression is worse than murder.Walid, who is the Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Michigan, was the keynote speaker Friday at the eighth semi-annual event called ``Social Justice in Islam,'' organized by the Western Michigan University student organization the Muslim Students Association and held in the Bernhard Center.

Walid, who lives in Detroit, addressed the more than 400 Muslims and non-Muslims in attendance by frequently reciting from the Quran in Arabic and then translating the meaning of the passages into English.

He stressed Islam's teaching about oppression and gave examples of how it harms the psyche of people for generations. He cited the shooting of a mosque on the 1700 block of East Main Street in late February as a local example. Members of the mosque said there is an ongoing problem with violence and drug activity in the area.

``This oppression has ingrained itself in some of our youth through a lack of, not only self esteem, but generations of going through inferior educational systems, not having access to certain economic opportunities,'' Walid said. ``

It has taken certain people within the African-American community outside of their human excellence or outside of the vision of how productive human beings should live within a civilized society. And it's hard to break out of.

This is why oppression is worse than murder.''He said oppression is still being felt around the world, including by Palestinians. Oppression is one reason for civil unrest, he said.(MORE)

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Response to "Islamists remain America's clear and present danger"
featured in Detroit News, Saturday March 17, 2007
View the article: http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007703170313

Kathleen Parker’s assessment of “Islamists” as a clear and present danger to America, is one in a long series of doomsday opinions that will result in nothing but an increase in the atmosphere of fear that has currently gripped the nation. And her claims that radical Islamist terrorists have an “insidious peaceful component” that is now present in the United States will serve to only increase the rise of Islamophobic sentiment that is so prevalent today.
Even though she makes a disclaimer that “not all of Islam is dangerous …but Islam as distorted and hijacked by radicals”, her claim that “Islamists” are the real danger begs the question: Who exactly is an “Islamist”? Who is dangerous? Will the average American be able to make the separation of a bearded Muslim man, or a Muslim woman who covers her hair from this insidious Islamist? American Muslims already feel that their religion is under siege, but now the idea that they may be viewed as an underground terrorist using “our laws of tolerance against us” can only do more harm. Ms. Parker’s views are also a form of extremism – extreme paranoia. She does not only harm the Muslim American community but adds fuel to the anxiety experienced by the American people as a whole. I agree with Ms. Parker that there is a clear and present danger to our society, but that danger is not Islamism but extremism – in any religion, shape or form.

Ruqaya Ali

Labels:

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Letters to Free Press and Detroit News about Tawfik Hamid

Response “ISLAM MUST CHANGE” article in Detroit Free Press

I was very disturbed to read your article “Islam must change, Muslim Activist Says” (March 14, 2007). Tawfik Hamid’s suggestion that “Islam must be reformed because [it] allows for hatred against other religions, terrorism and violence against women” not only shows his lack of knowledge of the religion of which he supposed to be an expert, but shows his hatred of it. Nowhere in Islam, which literally means “peace” is there anything that can be used to justify terrorism and the killing of innocents. What is most disturbing though is his message that Islam “threatens the civilized world and must be militarily and theologically defeated before it can be reformed.” Instead of calling for dialogue and understanding, his advice to the American people is that we need to bash someone into submission and then force change on them. His arguments that it will take violence to end violence will only serve to increase the instability in the Muslim world, and help extremism thrive and grow. As a Middle Easterner he knows more than anyone else that the root cause of violence in the Middle East is not religion, but politics. His blaming Islam however, leads one to question his motivation. His distortion of Islam will not serve to increase dialogue and understanding of the religion, his extremist views can only serve to increase the islamophobic environment that exists today. Tawfik Hamid does a disservice not only to the Muslim community but to American society as a whole. He does not serve to build bridges but destroy them.

Ruqaya

Response to “Talk on Islam under Fire” article in Detroit News

I was disturbed to read in your article titled “Talk on Islam under fire”, that people like Tawfik Hamid are invited to speak about Islam. Tawfik Hamid is not representative of the Muslim community in America. You would not invite a former Klu Klux Klan member to talk about Christianity, similarly why would you speak to a “former” extremist about Islam? The fact that he joined an extremist organization in the first place shows his lack of knowledge and understanding of Islam. Muslims have been saying over and over again that the actions of a few do not represent our religion. We have been trying to “take back” our religion from such “experts”. But it is very difficult to do so when people like Tawfik Hamid claim to speak for and misrepresent our community. Islam is a religion of peace, and the nowhere in the sacred Muslim text, the Qur’an, is there any justification for terrorism. If you want to understand Islam and Muslims speak to the average every day Moderate Muslim. Not a former “extremist” and now anti Muslim zealot. He does not represent us nor did he ever.

Ruqaya Ali

Friday, March 16, 2007

A Self-Proclaimed Expert on Terrorism

Hail freedom of speech, as the dubious self-proclaimed former terrorist, Tawfiq Hamid, was featured in DetroitFree Press on 14th March this year. Again, hail freedom of speech when another self-proclaimed reformer in Islam, Irshad Manji was also featured on March 1 of this year. These islamophobes are part of a new wave of speakers recently being brought to Michigan to speak authoritatively about Islam when they represent the same end of the bell curve that Osama Bin Laden does. One wonders why such extremists, who misinterpret the Qur'an and demonize the religion of Islam, are being sponsored so vehementlyby such sponsors as the Zionist organization of America.
The real focus should be to fight terrorism whenever and wherever they appear. Terrorism, unlike Tawfiq Hamid's claim, is not connected to any religion, if correctly interpreted. What is the point of religion if it doesn't promote peace! Terrorists may selectively use passages of any divine text, whether the Bible, The Torah or the Qur'an,mistranslate it and concoct plans to destroy their enemies regardless of method or means, however inhumane and unjustified.
When Tawfiq Hamid is given a platform in the name of freedom of speech, he and those who sponsor the likes of him risk being labelled as discriminatory or anti-islamic. Again, terrorism can have no religion. None of the monotheistic religions have ever supported terrorism. If Tawfiq Hamid and the sponsoring organizations want to talk about terrorism, let them be fair and bring in former terrorists from judaism and christianity as well. Let's bring Timothy McVeigh to talk about terrorism. I'm sure he would be rolling in his grave if he read about Tawfiq Hamid.
Several points about Tawfiq Hamid. He wrongfully claims that Islam promotes violence, and claims that this teaching of hatred will cause us to lose our freedom one day. He says, "that the most critical aspect of violent Islam...is the threat to our freedom". Firstly, there is no such thing as violent Islam, violent Christianity or violent Judaism. Islam does not teach of violence against any other religion, unless for self-defense. Terrorists and former terrorists, are a splinter in the majority muslim world. They reflect an extreme group without sufficient understanding of any religion. So do we fight the splinter or do we fight the entire muslim world! Also, the divine text of the muslims, the Qur'an declares "that there is no compulsion in religion". It promotes the freedom to chose to follow or not follow the text. Yet, the self-proclaimed expert, Tawfiq Hamid, declares that due to Islam, as understood today, we risk losing our freedom? What does "islam needs to be reformed" mean? How about claiming that judaism and christianity need to be reformed? Rather, Tawfiq Hamid needs to reform himself to allow for more sophistication when analyzing the issue of terrorism, as terrorism has no religion.
In the Detroit News, Tawfiq Hamid was quoted as calling for war upon "violent Islam" both militarily and theologically. Let me elaborate an obvious fact. Any war against any sovreign muslim nation, would actually initiate violence against the war mongers themselves. The case in point is Iraq, a country that never possessed any weapons of mass destruction. Tawfiq Hamid should change his message to promoting the peaceful message of Islam. Islam promotes justice, equality of women and recognize christians and jews as being people of the book whom God has commanded in the Qur'an to respect. Tawfiq Hamid's claim that the growth of the hijab is correlated to the growth of terrorism is false. Mother Mary wears the veil, nuns wear the veil, orthodox jewish women wear the veil. Tawfiq Hamid should respect the right of women to practice their religion as they interpret it.
It is hypocritical to address Tawfiq Hamid as a peacemaker when he is in truth a warmonger. It seems that he is still on the same side of the coin. If he is truly a former terrorist, he must have never read the Qur'an, as God surely commands muslims to respect christians and jews as the people of the Book.

Hurray for Geraldo

This morning on Fox, Geraldo actually defended the Muslim Imams that are suing Delta airlines and a specific passenger for their humilating treatment. American Muslims do not have to put up with this profiling and public humiliation. As Geralso said, the staff on the wirline reallyy screwed up, ad they will have to pay for it. Its the American way. Please harrass us more so we can sue! God knows our mosques need the money.

The suing game has been effectively by pro-Israeli groups suing Islamic charities for alleged links to Palestinian terror attacks... two can play that game... we need some lawyers to sue Israeli government officials and citizens for terror attacks also...

Hurray for Geraldo

This morning on Fox, Geraldo actually defended the Muslim Imams that are suing Delta airlines and a specific passenger for their humilating treatment. American Muslims do not have to put up with this profiling and public humiliation. As Geralso said, the staff on the wirline reallyy screwed up, ad they will have to pay for it. Its the American way. Please harrass us more so we can sue! God knows our mosques need the money.

The suing game has been effectively by pro-Israeli groups suing Islamic charities for alleged links to Palestinian terror attacks... two can play that game... we need some lawyers to sue Israeli government officials and citizens for terror attacks also...

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Khaled Sheikh Confesses to Everything

Khaled Sheikh Muhammad has confessed to EVERYTHING. The 9/11 attack, Bali bombing, beheading Daniel Pearl personally, plotting against Jimmy Carter, stealing kryptonite, assasination attempt against Paula Abdul (character assassination, not the other kind), the terrorist plot in Katrina which brought down the levies, Michigan's budget crisis (there are a lot of Arabs on medicaid in Dearborn after all), and the loss of Sanjay on American Idol. And if Sanjay hasn't lost by now, Khaled should be released simply to make sure Sanjay DOES lose. Thats all for now.

Sunday, March 11, 2007

300 the movie is on Bush's Top 10 list

The movie 300 was just released. It is an awesome battle movie, but its not the gore that is nauseating: it is the politics. The movie has as its underlying theme the civil, freedom loving, self sacrificing West, represented by the Spartans gallantly fighting the savage, dark, hedon "Asian hordes" who want to kill the men and enslave the women and children. Freedom is not free one of the defenders shout. We should honor the brave soldiers who are risking their lives so you can live in this wonderful society. Wow, all this rhetoric from over 2000 years ago. All great battle movies have their speeches, and the last speech in 300 is quite telling: the Greek general inspires his troops to fight against "the mysticism and tyranny of the East"

This movie was probably financed by the Department of Defense's Division of Creating Rhetoric and Hatred against Persians and other Riff Raff Asian types So We can Invade Them Too.

Friday, March 09, 2007

Panel discussion with Irshad Manji

http://muslimmedianetwork.com/mmn/?p=793

By Dana Inayah Cann, Muslim Media News Service (MMNS)

Detroit–March 1–Controversial speaker Irshad Manji, a frequent guest of anti-Muslim journalistic circles, appeared recently in the Detroit area before a skeptical crowd of local Muslims and others.

Through debates, lectures, a documentary and other outlets, this author, journalist, and activist has taken a no-holds-barred approach to Islam.

Last Thursday, Irshad Manji, the author of the book The Trouble with Islam: A Muslim’s Call for Reform in Her Faith was the topic of a discussion panel held at the Masonic Temple’s Scottish Rite Cathedral in Detroit.

Manji, a Canadian resident and well-known critic of Islam and orthodox interpretations of the Qur`an, was accompanied on stage by her mother Mumtaz Manji, Islamic scholar Saeed Khan, and activist Sofia B. Latif, a Communications Specialist who plays an active role in the Islamic community through her involvement with CAIR, CIOM, and other local Muslim organizations. Steve Spreitzer, the Director of Interfaith Programs for the Michigan Roundtable for Diversity and Inclusion, was the moderator for the panel discussion.

With nearly 70 in attendance, the audience first viewed Manji’s new film Faith Without Fear, which will air as a part of the week-long PBS series America at a Crossroads from April 15 to April 20. In Manji’s 60 minute film, which also includes her mother, she calls for revolutionary (she terms them evolutionary) changes in Islamic communities. In the film, Manji travels to the Middle East and back home to Canada, capturing images of women who she says has no identity after being completely covered and enduring the punishments Muslims go through for committing crimes. She also travels to different locations describing the different ways that Muslims practice their faith.

Following the film, Spreitzer had a few questions for the panel, and then allowed the audience to direct their questions to Manji.
“In order for me to discover the beauty of Islam, I first needed to have some very basic questions addressed. Questions like ‘Is religion the problem, or is it the manipulation of religion that’s the real problem? How much responsibility are mainstream Muslims to be taken for the horrific crimes that are so often happening under the banner of Islam? Does Islam itself contain the solution to the problem?’ And maybe most importantly, “What would the world be missing if Islam never existed?”
Manji stated that by opening herself up to these questions, she believes that she has undergone a transformation in this journey.

“I continue to speak out against unconscionable crimes, but my anger which is so evident in the book, and which is real and authentic in the book, has itself become transformed into respect, affection, [and] dare I say it, even love for my faith,” said Manji. “I guess you could say that I’m no longer criticizing Islam, I’m now challenging Muslims.”

Spreitzer then asked Manji’s mother, Mumtaz about her faith since being on this journey with her daughter.

“I have always had a very strong faith towards Allah,” said Mumtaz mentioning also that Allah has always helped her when she needed Him and has given her three beautiful daughters. “My faith is very strong from the very beginning until the day that I die.”

Spreitzer, focused his attention over to Sophia Begg Latif and Prof. Saeed Khan, asking them how they’ve maintained their faith living in America.

Latif stated that her parents and her community are supported of her religion and that wearing the hijab has made her a stronger person.

Khan said that he has lived in different parts of the U.S. and has been able to adapt to each situation where he has lived. He also stated that honesty is what helps him to maintain his religion.

Switching the panel discussion over to the audience, one of the questions asked of Manji was about her endorsement of the occupation in Palestine.

“It is quite the opposite,” said Manji, stating that she denounces the military occupation as well as the occupation “of the Palestinian people by their own corrupt leadership.”

Dawud Walid of CAIR Michigan asked Manji, “Don’t you think it could be troublesome for individual Muslims to say ‘I’m going to have my own independent Ijtihad?’ and not base it upon the Qur`an and the Sunna?”

Manji responded by saying that she has no problems with Islamic scholars, but Muslims should think independently on their own.

“We’ve got to give a wide spectrum of Muslims the ability of the opportunity to find their own voices,” said Manji. “I would argue that if we don’t do that then what we are winding up doing by default is reinforcing a pattern of submissiveness.”

Imam Abdullah Al-Amin asked Manji about her widely reported sexual orientation, and whether or not she consumes alcohol.

Manji said that she has never had alcohol and that she is a lesbian. She doesn’t think that people have to accept her as a lesbian, but she does feel that she and others who are lesbians should be harmed because of their choices.

“I don’t agree that the Qur`an is absolutely clear on the homosexuality question,” said Manji. “If God did not wish to make me a lesbian, why did He not use His unparallelled, unmatched powers to create somebody else in my place?”

A young Chinese American woman approached the microphone and asked Manji what was it about her that made anti-Islamic people attracted to her lectures and panel discussions. The questerioner also informed Manji that she had been outside the event’s venue passing out anti-Manji flyers (entitled The Trouble with Irshad Manji)

In a defensive tone, Manji told the woman that she should be glad that she has the freedom to hand out flyers that disrespect her without fearing getting arrested, unlike the Muslim women in Yemen who don’t have the freedom to speak their minds.

Kay Siblani, executive editor of The Arab American News asked Sophia Begg Latif her thoughts about the film.

Latif felt that Manji implied in the film that all Muslims are not trying to fix what is wrong with Islam. Manji disagreed, saying that she has a talk with an imam in the film who mentions finding solutions to correct the wrongdoings in Islam. To Latif, that simply was not enough.

At the end of the session, Manji stressed the need to liberate the entrepreneurial talents of Muslim women, especially in the Middle East as she talks about in Chapter 7 of her book.
“The multiplying affect of investing in Muslim women, and in women in general, cannot be underestimated,” said Manji.

Born in Uganda in 1968, Manji and her family moved to Canada near Vancouver in 1972 after 50,000 Asians were expelled by President Idi Amin. She earned an honors degree in the history of ideas from the University of British Columbia.

Manji has received Oprah Winfrey’s first annual Cutzpah Award for “audacity, nerve, boldness and conviction, while Ms. Magazine named her a “Feminist for the 21st Century.”

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Friedman is intentionally malicious: Muslims DO condemn the violence

In his syndicated column carried by the local Detroit Free Press/News, Thomas Friedman recently writes in Silence That Kills: "Nobody in the Arab world ‘’has the guts to say that what is happening in Iraq is wrong — that killing schoolkids is wrong,’’ said Mamoun Fandy, director of the Middle East program at the International Institute for Strategic Studies."

Huh? Muslims across the world have been condemning and trying to say this but nobody listens. There have been fatwas against terrororism, frequent condemnantions of this seneless violence by all mainstream Muslim scholars, leaders, cooks, moms, institutions, organizations, vidoe game players, boy scouts and football fans. See http://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20051209-042227-3029r

Why quote Mamoun Fandy on this? Why not actually ask the leader of a mainstream Muslim organziation in America. For the record, all Muslim leaders of mainstream American Muslim organzations such as CAIR, ISNA, ICNA. MPAC have condemned violence towards civilians and the sectarian violence rampant today. Even overseas, major conferences and summits have been held, including a recent joint statement between Rafsanjani and Qaradawi, both perhaps the most revered leading Shiite and Sunni scholars alive today. Why is this ignored? Is Friedman just stupid (after all, he claims to be an expert on the Middle East) or intentionally malicious?

Friedman and his ilk have constructed a fantasy universe where the only solution is teaching moral lessons to the savage Arabs and Muslims. Please, Friedman, save us, let us be more like you and use F-16s, cluster bombs, fabricated evidence, torture, secret detention camps, military tribunals and lots and lots of pundits to make the world a better place.